restrains for nucleaic acid base pairs
Hi, Does anybody know an easy way to restrain nucleic acid base pairs (base stacking+Watson-Crick base pairing) in phenix.refine? I am refining against a 3.3 A dataset. Thanks, Imre
Hi Imre, you need to define custom bonds between these pairs: http://phenix-online.org/documentation/refinement.htm see section "Definition of custom bonds and angles". phenix.refine does not do it automatically. Pavel. On 4/6/09 4:42 AM, Imre Toeroe wrote:
Hi,
Does anybody know an easy way to restrain nucleic acid base pairs (base stacking+Watson-Crick base pairing) in phenix.refine? I am refining against a 3.3 A dataset.
Thanks,
Imre
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
Dear Pavel, Thanks for the info. One more question: In half of the DNA the base pairing is between symmetry related bases as the DNA structure (Holliday junction) lies on a two-fold axis. Could it be a problem? Thanks, Imre Pavel Afonine wrote:
Hi Imre,
you need to define custom bonds between these pairs:
http://phenix-online.org/documentation/refinement.htm
see section "Definition of custom bonds and angles".
phenix.refine does not do it automatically.
Pavel.
On 4/6/09 4:42 AM, Imre Toeroe wrote:
Hi,
Does anybody know an easy way to restrain nucleic acid base pairs (base stacking+Watson-Crick base pairing) in phenix.refine? I am refining against a 3.3 A dataset.
Thanks,
Imre
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
Hi Imre,
Thanks for the info. One more question: In half of the DNA the base pairing is between symmetry related bases as the DNA structure (Holliday junction) lies on a two-fold axis. Could it be a problem?
You need to define the symmetry_operation in this case, e.g.: bond { action = *add atom_selection_1 = resname RXX and name NXX atom_selection_2 = resname RYY and name NYY symmetry_operation = -x,-y,z distance_ideal = 2.8 sigma = 0.1 slack = 0.4 } A few days ago Marjolein Thunnissen told us about this trick for finding the symmetry_operation: : Luckily it is actually not that : difficult to find the symmetry operators when using coot. One just has to : switch drawing symmetry atoms on and clicking on a symmetry atom, coot will : tell you in the bottom line which atom it is and which symmetry operator was : used to draw it... Ralf
Dear Ralf, Thanks, that worked perfectly together with the coot given symmetry operation. Imre Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote:
Hi Imre,
Thanks for the info. One more question: In half of the DNA the base pairing is between symmetry related bases as the DNA structure (Holliday junction) lies on a two-fold axis. Could it be a problem?
You need to define the symmetry_operation in this case, e.g.:
bond { action = *add atom_selection_1 = resname RXX and name NXX atom_selection_2 = resname RYY and name NYY symmetry_operation = -x,-y,z distance_ideal = 2.8 sigma = 0.1 slack = 0.4 }
A few days ago Marjolein Thunnissen told us about this trick for finding the symmetry_operation:
: Luckily it is actually not that : difficult to find the symmetry operators when using coot. One just has to : switch drawing symmetry atoms on and clicking on a symmetry atom, coot will : tell you in the bottom line which atom it is and which symmetry operator was : used to draw it...
Ralf _______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
participants (3)
-
Imre Toeroe
-
Pavel Afonine
-
Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve