Dear Phenix people, is there a major improvement in the algorithm? I have refined a 2.2 Ang. room temperature dataset with very good data statistics (I think) Rmerge 3.7%(8.9%) completeness 96%(92%) I/sigI 16,6(8,8) in parentheses are the values for the highest resolution shell. After refinement I have a R/Rfree of 0.1294/0.1670. In some shells there are values close to 0.100 and in the lowest shell Rfree is lower than Rwork. The quality of the data are really quite good, what is probably one of the reasons, but I am close or below to the border of the Range of R values in the pdb. Great for me, but I wanna be sure that it is really true. It was a MolRep with a close homolog, but I run a torsion angle sim annealing to decouple R/Rfree and the MolRep was done with an poly-Ala model to prevent too much model bias. Best Regards Christian
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Christian Roth
After refinement I have a R/Rfree of 0.1294/0.1670. In some shells there are values close to 0.100 and in the lowest shell Rfree is lower than Rwork.
Are you absolutely certain that you used the same R-free flags throughout refinement? -Nat
Oops I meant your I/sd is 8.8 in the highest resolution bin. F On Apr 3, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Nathaniel Echols wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Christian Roth
wrote: After refinement I have a R/Rfree of 0.1294/0.1670. In some shells there are values close to 0.100 and in the lowest shell Rfree is lower than Rwork.
Are you absolutely certain that you used the same R-free flags throughout refinement?
-Nat _______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
--------------------------------------------- Francis E. Reyes M.Sc. 215 UCB University of Colorado at Boulder
Hi Nat, Throughout the refinement yes. The initial Molrep was done in Phaser. It turned out that not I4 but I41 was the correct space group. I had already a I4I mtz ready for use and used that at the end . Not really a good Idea, but I thought after some macrocycles with sim annealing and rebuilding will overcome a potential coupling between the two sets. Maybe It was enough. I should take over the Rfree set of the very first I4 mtz and see what happen. Christian Am Dienstag 03 April 2012 19:05:39 schrieb Nathaniel Echols:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Christian Roth
wrote: After refinement I have a R/Rfree of 0.1294/0.1670. In some shells there are values close to 0.100 and in the lowest shell Rfree is lower than Rwork.
Are you absolutely certain that you used the same R-free flags throughout refinement?
-Nat _______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
-- Christian Roth Institut für Bioanalytische Chemie Biotechnologisch-Biomedizinisches Zentrum Fakultät für Chemie und Mineralogie Universität Leipzig Deutscher Platz 5 04103 Leipzig Telefon: +49 (0)341 97 31316 Fax: +49 (0)341 97 31319
Your resolution is a whopping 8.8 in the highest resolution bin. I bet you can see those reflections a mile away. The good news is that you can likely integrate to higher resolutions , the bad news is that your R/Rfree will likely go up. F On Apr 3, 2012, at 10:59 AM, Christian Roth wrote:
Dear Phenix people,
is there a major improvement in the algorithm? I have refined a 2.2 Ang. room temperature dataset with very good data statistics (I think) Rmerge 3.7%(8.9%) completeness 96%(92%) I/sigI 16,6(8,8) in parentheses are the values for the highest resolution shell.
After refinement I have a R/Rfree of 0.1294/0.1670. In some shells there are values close to 0.100 and in the lowest shell Rfree is lower than Rwork. The quality of the data are really quite good, what is probably one of the reasons, but I am close or below to the border of the Range of R values in the pdb. Great for me, but I wanna be sure that it is really true. It was a MolRep with a close homolog, but I run a torsion angle sim annealing to decouple R/Rfree and the MolRep was done with an poly-Ala model to prevent too much model bias.
Best Regards
Christian
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
Hi Christian, this is kind of Rwork/Rfree that you would get if you take a very high resolution structure, may be 1.2-1A and higher, cut the data off at 2.2A, and refine it again. So one explanation is that your crystals could probably diffract to a higher resolution... The command phenix.r_factor_statistics 2.2 gives typical R-factors at around 2.2A resolution are: Histogram of Rwork for models in PDB at resolution 2.10-2.30 A: 0.115 - 0.137 : 9 <<< you are here 0.137 - 0.159 : 121 0.159 - 0.182 : 703 0.182 - 0.204 : 1637 0.204 - 0.226 : 1749 0.226 - 0.248 : 735 0.248 - 0.270 : 147 0.270 - 0.293 : 12 0.293 - 0.315 : 2 0.315 - 0.337 : 2 Histogram of Rfree for models in PDB at resolution 2.10-2.30 A: 0.157 - 0.181 : 20 <<< you are here 0.181 - 0.205 : 163 0.205 - 0.229 : 784 0.229 - 0.253 : 1733 0.253 - 0.277 : 1617 0.277 - 0.301 : 671 0.301 - 0.325 : 101 0.325 - 0.349 : 22 0.349 - 0.373 : 5 0.373 - 0.397 : 1 Histogram of Rfree-Rwork for all model in PDB at resolution 2.10-2.30 A: 0.001 - 0.011 : 47 0.011 - 0.021 : 176 0.021 - 0.031 : 533 0.031 - 0.041 : 997 <<< you are here 0.041 - 0.050 : 1306 0.050 - 0.060 : 1062 0.060 - 0.070 : 602 0.070 - 0.080 : 216 0.080 - 0.090 : 113 0.090 - 0.100 : 65 Number of structures considered: 5117 Pavel On 4/3/12 9:59 AM, Christian Roth wrote:
Dear Phenix people,
is there a major improvement in the algorithm? I have refined a 2.2 Ang. room temperature dataset with very good data statistics (I think) Rmerge 3.7%(8.9%) completeness 96%(92%) I/sigI 16,6(8,8) in parentheses are the values for the highest resolution shell.
After refinement I have a R/Rfree of 0.1294/0.1670. In some shells there are values close to 0.100 and in the lowest shell Rfree is lower than Rwork. The quality of the data are really quite good, what is probably one of the reasons, but I am close or below to the border of the Range of R values in the pdb. Great for me, but I wanna be sure that it is really true. It was a MolRep with a close homolog, but I run a torsion angle sim annealing to decouple R/Rfree and the MolRep was done with an poly-Ala model to prevent too much model bias.
Best Regards
Christian
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
Is there an equivalent of phenix.r_factor_statistics for other parameters like RMSD bond angles/lengths? I note you can get histograms in the GUI version of polygon but only when you input a pdb file for validation. Thanks, Simon On 3 Apr 2012, at 18:41, Pavel Afonine wrote:
Hi Christian,
this is kind of Rwork/Rfree that you would get if you take a very high resolution structure, may be 1.2-1A and higher, cut the data off at 2.2A, and refine it again. So one explanation is that your crystals could probably diffract to a higher resolution...
The command
phenix.r_factor_statistics 2.2
gives typical R-factors at around 2.2A resolution are:
Histogram of Rwork for models in PDB at resolution 2.10-2.30 A: 0.115 - 0.137 : 9 <<< you are here 0.137 - 0.159 : 121 0.159 - 0.182 : 703 0.182 - 0.204 : 1637 0.204 - 0.226 : 1749 0.226 - 0.248 : 735 0.248 - 0.270 : 147 0.270 - 0.293 : 12 0.293 - 0.315 : 2 0.315 - 0.337 : 2 Histogram of Rfree for models in PDB at resolution 2.10-2.30 A: 0.157 - 0.181 : 20 <<< you are here 0.181 - 0.205 : 163 0.205 - 0.229 : 784 0.229 - 0.253 : 1733 0.253 - 0.277 : 1617 0.277 - 0.301 : 671 0.301 - 0.325 : 101 0.325 - 0.349 : 22 0.349 - 0.373 : 5 0.373 - 0.397 : 1 Histogram of Rfree-Rwork for all model in PDB at resolution 2.10-2.30 A: 0.001 - 0.011 : 47 0.011 - 0.021 : 176 0.021 - 0.031 : 533 0.031 - 0.041 : 997 <<< you are here 0.041 - 0.050 : 1306 0.050 - 0.060 : 1062 0.060 - 0.070 : 602 0.070 - 0.080 : 216 0.080 - 0.090 : 113 0.090 - 0.100 : 65 Number of structures considered: 5117
Pavel
On 4/3/12 9:59 AM, Christian Roth wrote:
Dear Phenix people,
is there a major improvement in the algorithm? I have refined a 2.2 Ang. room temperature dataset with very good data statistics (I think) Rmerge 3.7%(8.9%) completeness 96%(92%) I/sigI 16,6(8,8) in parentheses are the values for the highest resolution shell.
After refinement I have a R/Rfree of 0.1294/0.1670. In some shells there are values close to 0.100 and in the lowest shell Rfree is lower than Rwork. The quality of the data are really quite good, what is probably one of the reasons, but I am close or below to the border of the Range of R values in the pdb. Great for me, but I wanna be sure that it is really true. It was a MolRep with a close homolog, but I run a torsion angle sim annealing to decouple R/Rfree and the MolRep was done with an poly-Ala model to prevent too much model bias.
Best Regards
Christian
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Simon Kolstoe
Is there an equivalent of phenix.r_factor_statistics for other parameters like RMSD bond angles/lengths? I note you can get histograms in the GUI version of polygon but only when you input a pdb file for validation.
In the main GUI, click "Other tools" and select "Plot PDB statistics" - this will allow you to generate histograms for any of the statistics we've recorded, with optional resolution limits. -Nat
participants (5)
-
Christian Roth
-
Francis E Reyes
-
Nathaniel Echols
-
Pavel Afonine
-
Simon Kolstoe