Hi, I searched and didn't find any test for phenix.list, so no surprises it was broken or will be broken sooner or later. Yes, it's very useful tool - I didn't realist we have it. I have two minor suggestions: - since most of tool names are pretty cryptic, it would be very helpful to have a short line explaining the tool. For example: phenix.refine - crystallographic structure refinement phenix.maps - compute maps phenix.fmodel - compute structure factors etc... - may be we need filer out some of them and leave only those that the end-users may be interested in. For example, I have no idea what those are: boost.gcd boost.lcm and so on. Pavel. On 1/7/11 3:33 PM, Nathaniel Echols wrote:
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Bryan Lepore
wrote: Note that you can get a complete list of jiffies like this with: phenix.list
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Tom Terwilliger
wrote: tried a few installations, i get this : TypeError: coercing to Unicode: need string or buffer, NoneType found Wow, I wonder how long that's been broken. Sorry, should be working again tomorrow.
-Nat