Re: [phenixbb] Map quality

At present it uses actual map given at input, not map coefficients. Several people requested to add a functionality so that it can use map coefficients too, I will add this once I get a chance. Pavel On 5/19/15 5:27 AM, Smith Liu wrote:

Dear Pavel, Can phenix.map_comparison be used to compare CCP4 map and mtz map? How to input map files in order to use this command? Smith

At 2015-05-19 13:25:28, "Pavel Afonine" wrote:

Yes: phenix.map_comparison .

Pavel

On 5/16/15 12:28 PM, Murpholino Peligro wrote:

...

So...Is there a tool/program/formula to get equivalent sigma levels between maps so they can be compared?

2015-05-15 11:37 GMT-05:00 Pavel Afonine mailto:[email protected]>:

Hi Mohamed,

this is not a simple topic.. Two texts I suggest to have a look at are listed below I'm sure there are more). They may not give you a quick solution but perhaps will explain the issues.

Acta Cryst. (2014). D70, 2593-2606 Metrics for comparison of crystallographic maps

Acta Cryst. (2015). D71, 646-666. FEM: feature-enhanced map

In a very nutshell,

- "1 sigma (or any other x sigma) level for one map may not be the same as 1 sigma (or any other x sigma) level for another map"; - Think of "global vs local". Somehow you need to quantify map quality locally. - Map correlation (RSCC or map CC, for alternative names) may be a misleading metric is used without care: for example, two poor but similar map may give you high CC.

All the best, Pavel

On 5/15/15 9:10 AM, mohamed noor wrote:

Dear all

Is there a single (or a few) metrics that can be used to quantitatively assess map quality instead of looking at each one in Coot? For example, I want to compare the effect of having low completeness in the low resolution shells.

Thanks.

_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] mailto:[email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb Unsubscribe: [email protected] mailto:[email protected]