Hi Christopher,
Thanks for your informative and prompt reply.
On reexamining the output, I think then that I misunderstood the output. The NBCs listed below are from *refinement* analysis, not molprobity analysis. I was mislead because there were no NBCs listed in the Molprobity part of the log file.
Yes, you are right, the output of phenix.clashscore was what I actually wanted, not phenix.molprobity and a .geo file.
Regards,
Paul.
Hi Paul,
As I understand it, a .geo file is most usually produced as one of the outputs of refinement. A few different places, such as this documentation (https://www.phenix-online.org/documentation/file_formats.html#geometry-restraints-info-geo) and this newsletter article (http://phenix-online.org/newsletter/CCN_2016_01.pdf#page=10) mention this method of generation.
However, you can generate a geo file directly from a model with this commandline:phenix.pdb_interpretation your_model.pdb write_geo_files=TrueThis is probably the more useful option for your purposes.
For understanding clashes, I recommend running phenix.clashscore and using its dedicated and complete output. This will return a list of all the clashes, sorted in order of severity.
As to non-bonded interaction distances, I believe that they are close approaches between atoms that are not covalently bonded. As you can see from the histogram bins (1.87 - 2.42, 2.42 - 2.96, 2.96 - 3.51, 3.51 - 4.05, 4.05 - 4.60A), these distances do not necessarily indicate clashes, but instead cover a range of distances in the general vdW contact region. The distribution of this histogram gives a general sense of how well packed the model is.
Very close non-bonded interactions may register as clashes in Probe and/or may generate various error messages in Phenix depending on your options. For various reasons, there is not an exact mapping between close non-bonded interactions and clashes.
Hopefully someone with a better understanding of the nonbonded distances will be able to chime in with a better explanation.
Good luck,-Christopher Williams---Richardson Lab, Duke University
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 1:00 PM Paul Emsley <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to compare the restraints generated by Coot to the validation
provided by molprobity. When I run phenix.molprobity on my model, it
gives me (amongst other things) this:
-----------------------
Histogram of nonbonded interaction distances:
1.87 - 2.42: 526
2.42 - 2.96: 3217
2.96 - 3.51: 3639
3.51 - 4.05: 5026
4.05 - 4.60: 6847
Nonbonded interactions: 19255
Sorted by model distance:
nonbonded pdb=" O LEU A 21 "
pdb=" H GLY A 26 "
model vdw
1.874 1.850
nonbonded pdb=" H ILE A 71 "
pdb=" O TYR A 80 "
model vdw
1.920 1.850
nonbonded pdb=" H GLY A 34 "
pdb=" O GLU A 54 "
model vdw
1.925 1.850
nonbonded pdb=" O ILE A 71 "
pdb=" H TYR A 80 "
model vdw
1.937 1.850
nonbonded pdb=" HE ARG A 40 "
pdb=" HG1 THR A 76 "
model vdw sym.op.
1.955 2.100 -x+3/2,-y,z+1/2
... (remaining 19250 not shown)
NOTE: a complete listing of the restraints can be obtained by requesting
output of .geo file.
--------------------------
I don't understand this lilst. Should I be concerned by those
interactions? Which of these atom pairs are contributing to the clashscore?
Perhaps the details are in the .geo file? How do I get a .geo file? I
googled, I didn't find the answer. How could I have found the answer
without asking here?
Thanks,
Paul.
_______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list
[email protected]
http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
Unsubscribe: [email protected]