Yes. It is 2Fo-Fc map. The resolution is 1.36 with 97% completeness.
I have attached three small screen shots to clarify your suggestions.
lig density-ref11.tif- 2Fo-Fc map before ligand fitting
lig omit density.tif - map after omitting the ligand from the final pdb.
density-no lig.tif - map without the ligand using the final pdb
Thanks
Mary
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 11:41 -0400, Desi Mail wrote:BTW, do you mean 2Fo-Fc map, not 2Fo? And what exactly you mean by poor
> But the 2Fo map around the ligand without omit is well defined.
> Phenix defines a very big box around the target pdb-includes
> surrounding protein residues. Is there a way to control this?
>
> The omit map of the water molecule in the binding site is also poor.
>
density?
Don't know if the box size can be changed, but if you want to omit just
the ligand, follow Jacob's suggestion - omit the ligand and run
simulated annealing to remove bias.
In theory, the observed behavior suggests model bias. What's the
resolution?
--
"I'd jump in myself, if I weren't so good at whistling."
Julian, King of Lemurs
_______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list
phenixbb@phenix-online.org
http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb