Hey,
Looks like a wrong fit model. You can check this is the only error.  Over all model quality and processing statistics and refinement statistics.


On Fri, 4 Apr 2025, 11:36 am Pavel Afonine, <pafonine@lbl.gov> wrote:

Hi Lucas,

this is odd. I can have a look if you send me the model and data files (off-list). As Dale suggested, this looks like xyz/B/occupancy aren't correct for these atoms.

Pavel

On 3/26/25 20:04, Lucas Souza wrote:

Hi everyone,

I am refining a ~3A structure using phenix 1.21.2-5419. I am at the final stages of the refinement but I am seeing some positive density on some hydrophobic residues (mainly Ile and Leu) together with a negative density around those residues (image attached).  At first, I guessed that might be related to solvent mask, so I turned on optimize_mask. That did not solve the issue, although slightly decreased R values. Diffraction data was processed with autoproc+staraniso and does not seem to be twinned (normal intensity stats + map deteriorates if twinning refinement is applied).

Does anyone have a guess about that?

Best,
Lucas

-- 
Lucas Souza dos Santos
Laboratório de Biologia Estrutural Aplicada (LBEA)
Departamento de Microbiologia
Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas II - USP
Cidade Universitária - São Paulo - SP
CEP 05508-000




_______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list -- phenixbb@phenix-online.org
To unsubscribe send an email to phenixbb-leave@phenix-online.org
Unsubscribe: phenixbb-leave@%(host_name)s
_______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list -- phenixbb@phenix-online.org
To unsubscribe send an email to phenixbb-leave@phenix-online.org
Unsubscribe: phenixbb-leave@%(host_name)s