Re: [phenixbb] Maximum Likelihood Method for Twinning

In terms of actual implementation I have this in mind: http://www.phenix-online.org/newsletter/CCN_2011_01.pdf "Maximum likelihood refinement of twinned structures", page 29. Of course that would not stop (me) from implementing better ideas should they arrive. However the paper mentioned above pictures a clear image of the problem that we are going to address. Pavel On 7/29/14, 12:30 PM, Chris Fage wrote:

Thank you, Randy, Nat, and Peter. I'll keep an eye out for that pub.

Best, Chris

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Randy Read mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

Yes, we were hoping to make some generalisations and improvements before publishing this. (Which we obviously haven't gotten around to doing yet!)

Randy

----- Randy J. Read Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge Cambridge Institute for Medical Research Tel: +44 1223 336500 tel:%2B44%201223%20336500 Wellcome Trust/MRC Building Fax: +44 1223 336827 tel:%2B44%201223%20336827 Hills Road E-mail: [email protected] mailto:[email protected] Cambridge CB2 0XY, U.K. www-structmed.cimr.cam.ac.uk http://www-structmed.cimr.cam.ac.uk

On 29 Jul 2014, at 13:44, Nathaniel Echols mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Chris Fage mailto:[email protected]> wrote: > Can anyone please direct me to a literature reference describing the maximum likelihood method for detection of twinning based on twin laws, as implemented in phenix.xtriage? > > If you mean the twin fraction estimation, the code doesn't have anything more helpful than this: > > Zwart, Read, Grosse-Kunstleve & Adams, to be published > > -Nat > _______________________________________________ > phenixbb mailing list > [email protected] mailto:[email protected] > http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb

_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb