- phenixbb - phenix-online.org

on "occupancies" in the phenix.refine GUI
by Smith Liu 07 Sep '15

07 Sep '15

Dear All, In my map for a specific HISresidue, it was rather clear the sidechain has 2 conformations. In my start modle, I only have the PDB for 1 of the 2 conformations of the sidechain. With "occupancies" clicked, the refined PDB still only contain the PDB for 1of the 2 conformations of the sidechain (occupancy is 1). Thus in order to have the GUI "occupancies" takes function, I need manually add the PDB for the conformation of the other side chain, am I right? If I am right，will you please show me an PDB example which contains the conformations for 2 or several sidechains of a residue, so that I can know how to edit this kind of PDB? Best regards. Smith

2 1

Transfer FreeR and FreeR test set flag value
by Matthew Chu 06 Sep '15

06 Sep '15

Dear All, I am trying to refine my model against a higher resolution dataset. My colleage's old-low resolution dataset was processed in HKL/scalepack and the FreeR was assigned by Phenix.reflection file editor, which I assume the test set was marked as "1". Now I got a new-higher resolution dataset, and plan to process it in XDS/Aimless. I want to transfer the FreeR set from his old mtz and also use his low res model for the new refinement. My question is, when I transfer the FreeR set from his old mtz with flag value as "1" in Aimless, is the flag value now "1" or "0" in the new mtz output by Aimless? Can Aimless recognize the FreeR flag from the old mtz which are marked as "1"? I also read an old post from Nat Echols in 2011: "For Phenix, 1 is test, 0 is work, but you could reverse this and it will still figure out what to do automatically", so does it mean it doesn't matter if the FreeR is "1" or "0" in the mtz from Aimless, if I use phenix.refine for my new dataset, Phenix can figure out which is the correct FreeR value? It's a mix of CCP4 and Phenix question, so I have crossed posted it in the CCP4bb as well. Many thanks, Matt

2 2

a question on phenix refine
by Smith Liu 05 Sep '15

05 Sep '15

Dear All, For the GUI of phenix.refine, if we click "Optimize X-ray/stereochemistry weight", it should optimize on how to part the weight between X-ray and stereochemistry. Then if we do not click "Optimize X-ray/stereochemistry weight", phenix.refine will do with whole weight from "X-ray" or whole weight from "stereochemistry"? I am looking forward to getting your reply. Smith

2 1

Space group
by mohamed noor 04 Sep '15

04 Sep '15

Dear all I processed my images in point group P 3 2 1. After running Phaser and building it, the space group was P 3(2) 2 1. However, the refinement is stuck with Rfree at around 35-38 % (data extending to 3.3 A). As I believe the R factor is a bit high, and I have a different crystal form in P4(2) 2(1) 2 with R free at 25 % for data to 3.8 A, I expanded it to P 1, redid Phaser searching for 48 copies. After refinement, the R free is at 38 %. For some reason, Zanuda/Refmac is not able to read my files. So I ran Xtriage instead: A summary of R values for various possible point groups follow. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Point group | mean R_used | max R_used | mean R_unused | min R_unused | BIC | choice | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | P 3 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.271 | 0.000 | 3.521e+05 | | | C 1 2 1 (2*y,-x+y,z) | 0.423 | 0.423 | 0.200 | 0.000 | 1.763e+06 | | | P 1 | None | None | 0.219 | 0.000 | 1.056e+06 | | | P 6 | 0.242 | 0.423 | 0.200 | 0.000 | 1.365e+06 | | | C 2 2 2 (x+y,2*y,z) | 0.271 | 0.423 | 0.200 | 0.000 | 1.464e+06 | | | P 3 2 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.423 | 0.423 | 1.761e+05 | | | P 3 1 2 | 0.242 | 0.423 | 0.200 | 0.000 | 1.365e+06 | | | C 2 2 2 (2*x,x+y,z) | 0.271 | 0.423 | 0.200 | 0.000 | 1.464e+06 | | | P 1 1 2 | 0.423 | 0.423 | 0.200 | 0.000 | 1.763e+06 | | | P 6 2 2 | 0.219 | 0.423 | None | None | 1.265e+06 | | | C 1 2 1 (x+y,-x+y,z) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.242 | 0.000 | 5.282e+05 | | | C 1 2 1 (x+y,2*y,z) | 0.423 | 0.423 | 0.200 | 0.000 | 1.763e+06 | | | C 1 2 1 (x-y,2*x,z) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.242 | 0.000 | 5.282e+05 | | | C 2 2 2 (x-y,x+y,z) | 0.271 | 0.423 | 0.200 | 0.000 | 1.464e+06 | | | C 1 2 1 (2*x,x+y,z) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.242 | 0.000 | 5.282e+05 | | | C 1 2 1 (x-y,x+y,z) | 0.423 | 0.423 | 0.200 | 0.000 | 1.763e+06 | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- R_used: mean and maximum R value for symmetry operators *used* in this point group R_unused: mean and minimum R value for symmetry operators *not used* in this point group Looking at the R values, it is possible that it is actually C 1 2 1. My questions: 1. What is the difference between the C 1 2 1 lines? What do the values in brackets mean? 2. Since Xtriage did indicate a possible NCS axis parallel to crystallographic axis (and it looks almost like that in my P321 model), do I reintegrate in one of those C121 and then redo Phaser/refinement? I can post a screenshot of model if that will help. Thanks. Mohamed

1 0

Positive density at metal ions
by Jan van Agthoven 03 Sep '15

03 Sep '15

Hi everyone, I work on a structure of about 3 A resolution. The structure is almost done except for 3 metal ions which remain positive in the density. The metal is clearly Mn (refinement works fine for an other very similar structure) and has been set at full occupancy. I tried to reset the B factor at lower values, which solves the problem for 2 metal ions but not the 3rd one. Is there anything else I can do? Jan

2 1

Rwork higher than Rfree
by Smith Liu 01 Sep '15

01 Sep '15

Dear All, Is poor resolution a factor leading to Rwork higher than Rfree? Any other factor? Best regards. Smith

1 0

Cell dimentions
by Bradley Hintze 29 Aug '15

29 Aug '15

Hello I have some interesting DNA structures I would like help with . The duplexes are stacked in the crystal head to head and tail to tail. This creates an interesting situation where an adenine is base pairing with itself across cell symmetry. The most likely way in which adenines base pairs with itself is if one is in the syn conformation and the other is in anti, i.e. a Hoogsteen base pair. However, that would break the symmetry as they are the same adenine and thus can't have two conformations. As such, I think it's appropriate to have two molecules, rather than one, in the asymmetric unit. I can make the new model easily enough by generating a symmetry mate and assigning different chain IDs but how do I appropriately calculate the new cell dimensions? Thanks, Bradley

2 1

on phenix refine of the cryo-EM data
by Smith Liu 29 Aug '15

29 Aug '15

Dear All, Phenix.real_space_refine can give nice results, but I still want to refine it by phenix refine graphical interface so that the refined PDB by Phenix.real_space_refine can have a much better resolution PDB from crystal structure as a reference PDB for further refine by phenix refine GUI, in case a fragment of the sequence may adopt a sheet structure as the reference structure, rather than a loop structure as obtained by Phenix.real_space_refine. When I use the phenix refine GUI for further refine, do I need to use electron scattering table, or I continue to use n-Gaussian scattering table? For the phenix refine GUI for this purpose, there will ne no necessity to click Optimized X-ray/sterochemistry weight and Optimize X-ray/ADP weight, as for it has no relationship with X-ray, am I right? The phenix.map_to_structure_factors converted mtz file, should correspond to the 2FoFcWT file. In the phenix GUI refine process, it will calculate the FoFcWT file. But each time I tried the refine by phenix GUI related to phenix.map_to_structure_factors converted mtz file, the signal of the FoFcWT file was almost as strong as or even much stronger than the 2FoFcWT file, which was in strong contrast with the phenix refine based on the crystal mtz file. Will you please explain why for phenix.map_to_structure_factors converted mtz file, phenix GUI can give such high signal of FoFcWT file? Best regards. Smith

1 0

off-topic: tenure track faculty position in cryo-EM
by Markus Seeliger 27 Aug '15

27 Aug '15

*Department of Pharmacological Sciences at **Stony Brook University * *Tenure-Track Cryo-EM Faculty Position in Conjunction with the Interdisciplinary Biomolecular Imaging Cluster Hiring Initiative* The Department of Pharmacological Sciences ( http://www.pharm.stonybrook.edu/faculty_research/overview) at Stony Brook University seeks applications for a tenure-track faculty position at the level of Assistant, Associate, or Full Professor. Candidates must have an M.D. and/or Ph.D., at least two years of postgraduate research experience, and an outstanding record of research accomplishment. This search is intended to recruit investigators with translational research programs that make use of Cryo-EM to pursue fundamental questions relevant to health-connected fields such as cancer, neuroscience, metabolism, and infectious disease. Senior candidates should have a record of success with extramural funding and training of students and/or fellows. Applicants must be eligible for a faculty appointment in accordance with the criteria established by the School of Medicine (Criteria for Appointment, Promotion and Tenure.) The Department has pre-doctoral and MSTP training grants, a broad infrastructure for research investigation, and newly renovated lab space housing structural biologists with expertise in NMR and x-ray crystallography. Many of the faculty use EM and Super-Resolution microscopy approaches, and additional structural biologists and imagers are found in the Departments of Biochemistry, Physiology, Chemistry, Microbiology, Neurobiology, and Biomedical Engineering. With the on-going NYSUNY 2020 Challenge Grant awarded to the University and the recent and largest gift ever to public higher education in the State of New York, Stony Brook University is embarking on a transformational expansion of the biomedical research enterprise. Diverse opportunities for collaborative research on campus include the Cancer Center, the Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, the Center for Structural Biology, the Institute for Chemical Biology and Drug Discovery, and the interactive Computer Science and Applied Mathematics Departments. Imaging biological molecules is key to understanding their function, providing a starting point for rational drug design and protein engineering. Stony Brook University (SBU) is becoming a leader in biomolecular imaging through its newly-upgraded high-field NMR facilities including Bruker 700MHz and 850 MHz instruments with cryogenic probes, a strong program in computational structural and physical biology, world-class computational resources, facilities for radiotracer synthesis and human imaging, and proximity to the new third- generation synchrotron facility at Brookhaven National Lab (NSLS-II). The Biomolecular Imaging Cluster has already recruited junior faculty with expertise in x-ray crystallography and in super-resolution microscopy to add to our recent NIH-funded purchase of SIM and STORM instrumentation. *Most relevant to this recruitment, SBU received this year a $2M Shared Instrumentation award from NIH to obtain a state-of-the-art 200 kV Talos cryo-EM microscope and detector that will be installed and go live in Spring, 2016. * Stony Brook University, home to many highly-ranked graduate research programs, is located 60 miles from New York City on Long Island's scenic North Shore. Our 1,100-acre campus has more than 24,000 undergraduate, graduate, and doctoral students and 13,500 faculty and staff. The University is a member of the prestigious Association of American Universities and co-manager of the nearby Brookhaven National Laboratory, a multidisciplinary research laboratory supporting world-class scientific programs utilizing state-of- the-art facilities. Stony Brook University is also located close to the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory with which it interacts through graduate program training and faculty collaborations. To apply, use Academic Jobs Online ( https://academicjobsonline.org/ajo/jobs/5904) to submit a State employment application, a complete curriculum vitae including publications, and a 3-page proposed research plan of current and future research, and have three letters of recommendation submitted through the AJO site. The cover letter should indicate whether the applicant wishes to be considered for appointment at the Assistant, Associate, or Full Professor level. Applicants at the Associate or Full Professor level should add a summary of past and current research funding and administrative and teaching experiences. *Electronic submission through AJO is required.* Questions should be addressed to Ms. Lynda Perdomo-Ayala, Department Administrator ( lynda.perdomo-ayala(a)stonybrook.edu, fax (631-444-9749.) POSITION OPEN UNTIL FILLED. For a full position description, visit www.stonybrook.edu/jobs (Ref.F-9530/15/08). Stony Brook University is an Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity Educator and Employer.

1 0

Re: [phenixbb] phenixbb Digest, Vol 117, Issue 9
by Cesar Santiago 27 Aug '15

27 Aug '15

Hi Mark! Anybody for the 24th trip to Alba? I'll be away from the 1st - 16th of September but I can still arrange the trip before leaving. César. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Cesar Santiago, Ph. D. Dept. of Macromolecules Structure at CNB, CSIC. X-ray Crystallography Facility. Campus Universidad Autónoma. Madrid, 28049 csantiag(a)cnb.csic.es On Aug 27, 2015, at 6:42 AM, phenixbb-request(a)phenix-online.org wrote: > Send phenixbb mailing list submissions to > phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > phenixbb-request(a)phenix-online.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > phenixbb-owner(a)phenix-online.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of phenixbb digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: phenix.refine automatic linking options (Engin ?zkan) > 2. external passive 3D monitor with macbook pro or imac for coot > and pymol stereo view (Xiao Lei) > 3. Rank-scaled map (Jianghai Zhu) > 4. Re: Rank-scaled map (Pavel Afonine) > 5. Re: on the starting mtz file for phenix refine (Pavel Afonine) > 6. Ligand addition in COOT for later refinement in Phenix.refine > (Manoj saxena) > 7. Re: Ligand addition in COOT for later refinement in > Phenix.refine (Oleg Sobolev) > 8. Computational Crystallography Newsletter - Volume 6, Number 2 > (Nigel Moriarty) > 9. Starting structure as reference model - crashing in 1.10-2142 > (Tristan Croll) > 10. Re: Starting structure as reference model - crashing in > 1.10-2142 (Pavel Afonine) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:41:31 -0500 > From: Engin ?zkan <eozkan(a)uchicago.edu> > To: Billy Poon <bkpoon(a)lbl.gov> > Cc: PHENIX user mailing list <phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org> > Subject: Re: [phenixbb] phenix.refine automatic linking options > Message-ID: <55D63B7B.6000707(a)uchicago.edu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed" > > Dear Billy and Nigel, > > Thank you. Phenix.refine GUI in the latest nightly/release candidate no > longer has the master enable/disable button, and so the problem is resolved. > > Engin > > On 8/13/15 11:28 AM, Billy Poon wrote: >> Hi Engin, >> >> Thanks! We updated that part of the GUI so that it should be more >> intuitive. There is now a button that lets you apply automatic linking >> to all the components and a button that disables all automatic >> linking. You can, of course, still pick which components to enable by >> checking the specific boxes. >> >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Engin ?zkan <eozkan(a)uchicago.edu >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Dear Developers, >> >> Using the latest phenix nightly, I observed something odd in the >> phenix.refine UI, and I thought I should report it. If one >> unchecks Automatic ligand linking, this seems to not override its >> options, as the instructions in the Options window suggest. >> Specifically, if "Automatic Ligand Linking" is unchecked, but the >> "Link metals" is checked within its Options window, metal link >> restraints are still created. >> >> I checked the .geo file to confirm this. >> >> Thanks, >> Engin >> >> _______________________________________________ >> phenixbb mailing list >> phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org <mailto:[email protected]> >> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb >> Unsubscribe: phenixbb-leave(a)phenix-online.org >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> >> > >

1 0