Personally I think moving the cctbx to git is a great idea as it would make it easier and safer when developing and testing new features. Given so many teams are using the cctbx this seems like a compelling reason for it to be moved. We had a chat a while ago with Berkeley about this but I've forgotten what the consensus was. Rob
Message: 1 Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:10:03 +0000 From:
To: Subject: Re: [cctbxbb] Not wishing to raise this again but... Message-ID: <13999B6FC038EB44B067771E3CFBD091BC327D8E@exchmbx03> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi All,
This sounds like it is heading in a pragmatic direction - I would find it very helpful to gauge feeling for or against this. To make this simple I have attempted (starting from a completely ignorant position) to put together one of those online survey things:
https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/GXPY5JW
If you could pick an option that would be great, explaining why would be even better, or hitting reply-all to this thread would also work (as has previously done so) I'll collate answers over the next few days & feed back when we have (say) 10-20 or a few days have passed
From experience with moving xia2 & DIALS it was surprisingly straightforward (an opinion)
Thanks & cheerio Graeme
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: 14 June 2016 12:18 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [cctbxbb] Not wishing to raise this again but...
Hi Pavel,
I volunteered to do this some time ago, just like for DIALS, and would still be happy to do this. We can do the move slowly, so allow users (developers) with a git repository while development still happens in SVN for say a couple of weeks, and I would be happy to run the git support for that time and for the aftermath of the move.
Best wishes -Markus
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pavel Afonine Sent: 14 June 2016 12:11 To: cctbx mailing list Subject: Re: [cctbxbb] Not wishing to raise this again but...
Hey there!
Well I guess I say something even though I don't have much to say really. I've been contributing to CCTBX for the past 13 years, so I feel like this conversation is not too irrelevant to me to say the least.
I don't have strong opinion about staying with svn vs moving to git. I routinely contribute to CCTBX (which is SVN-based) and I routinely contribute to my other activity - Q|R (Quantum Refinement, which is hosted by GitHub). I'm comfortable with both environments as I'm using only the minimal functionality of both: check in, check out, diff.. period. I'm not interested in branching/etc sophistication; this is just because the way I structure my workflow..
My current understanding is that moving CCTBX to use git boils down to: - actually someone doing it; AND - taking good proper responsible care of the aftermath (if any).
So far no-one volunteered to embrace this challenge, as far as I know.
In summary I think we should move to git, at least to follow the vector of progress.
All the best, Pavel