19 Jan
2018
19 Jan
'18
8:02 a.m.
Hi Rob,
What is currently complicating this is the inclusion of the dxtbx module within the cctbx_project.
and in particular that iotbx depends on it, as it was discussed half a year ago in a thread: "shall iotbx really depends on dxtbx?"
If all a user wants is to calculate allowed origins and symmetry sites for a given space group then an alternative to CCTBX might be preferable rather than having to massively expand their project [...]
Yes! Please don't change it :-) It's one of the selling points for a library I'm working on ( https://project-gemmi.github.io/ ). Cheers, Marcin