On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Marcin Wojdyr <wojdyr@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi, we need to pick a version of cctbx for CCP4 for use in phaser and DIALS.
The latest logs at
cci.lbl.gov/cctbx_build/show_error_summary.cgi?build_tag=2014_10_05_2205
show in all builds:

[Errno 2] No such file or directory
Traceback (most recent call last):
ImportError: __import__("boost_python_meta_ext"): No module named
boost_python_meta_ext

This was an attempt to do something clever that backfired - it's fixed now. There are still some errors in the current test logs that I need to look at, and some issues with our build machines, but otherwise everything should be reasonably stable.

Is it better to pick older version?

In this case it might be worth going back a few days. I was hoping to have a new "release" (a meaningless term in the context of CCTBX, but apparently we're expected to do this) online soon, but the 32-bit Windows build is currently MIA and we need to get that working first. However, for CCP4's purposes I think everything you use is relatively stable (but check with the DIALS developers too). It's mostly modules like mmtbx that are unstable, but I don't think Phaser uses that.

-Nat