- cctbxbb - phenix-online.org

Re: [cctbxbb] cctbxbb Digest, Vol 92, Issue 17
by Tijskens Engelbert 21 Nov '16

21 Nov '16

> Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:38:21 +0000 > From: Gabor Bunkoczi <gabor.bunkoczi(a)googlemail.com> > To: cctbx mailing list <cctbxbb(a)phenix-online.org> > Subject: Re: [cctbxbb] convert an arbitrary point to one inside the > asymmetric unit > Message-ID: > <CABYxhoUxqFsc0f_TjWwn4oC4hKFk8AEbzwx5=9=_+gwW3xmkpg(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On second thought, the simplest solution is to use the direct_space_asu > object. This is available for all space groups: > >>>> from cctbx import sgtbx >>>> sgi = sgtbx.space_group_info( "P2" ) >>>> asu = sgi.direct_space_asu() >>>> asu.is_inside( ( 0, 0, 0 ) ) > True >>>> asu.is_inside( (0, 0, 0.51 ) ) > False > > BW, Gabor > Thanks for your quick reply, Gabor. Unfortunately, it does not solve my question. For the example you give above, the second point is not inside the asu, and my question is how i can the corresponding point inside the asu, For a simple space group as P2 the answer is easily figured out by hand. For a space group such as I m -3 m, it becomes complicated. I would like to have a (computationally efficient) method for finding the point inside the asu given an arbitrary point which works for every space group. Any “third” thoughts? kindest regards, bert

2 1

Re: [cctbxbb] Unstable platform-dependent sort order for flex.sort_permutation
by richard.gildea＠diamond.ac.uk 20 Nov '16

20 Nov '16

Hi Oleg, The permutations would lead to the same sequence of miller indices, but in the context of an unmerged reflection array (i.e. miller.array.sort_permutation), then the data associated with those miller indices would not necessarily be in the same order. As the dataset is then split into two half-datasets, this difference in sort order leads to a different value of the calculate correlation coefficient between those two half datasets: https://github.com/cctbx/cctbx_project/blob/master/cctbx/miller/__init__.py… Cheers, Richard Dr Richard Gildea Data Analysis Scientist Tel: +441235 77 8078 Diamond Light Source Ltd. Diamond House Harwell Science & Innovation Campus Didcot Oxfordshire OX11 0DE ________________________________ From: cctbxbb-bounces(a)phenix-online.org [cctbxbb-bounces(a)phenix-online.org] on behalf of oleg(a)olexsys.org [oleg(a)olexsys.org] Sent: 18 November 2016 15:59 To: cctbx mailing list Subject: Re: [cctbxbb] Unstable platform-dependent sort order for flex.sort_permutation Hi Richard, it is a bug only if the permutations do not lead to the same sequence. Otherwise you cannot expect to get the same sorting permutations for collections with redundant data on different platforms or even between different versions of compilers. Cheers, Oleg. ________________________________ From: cctbxbb-bounces(a)phenix-online.org <cctbxbb-bounces(a)phenix-online.org> on behalf of richard.gildea(a)diamond.ac.uk <richard.gildea(a)diamond.ac.uk> Sent: 18 November 2016 14:12:29 To: cctbxbb(a)phenix-online.org Subject: [cctbxbb] Unstable platform-dependent sort order for flex.sort_permutation Hi, I've been trying to diagnose why the miller array cc_anom calculations seem to be platform dependent. I've narrowed this down to a variation in the sort order returned by flex.sort_permutation which is called from within miller.array.sort("packed_indices"). The following code demonstrates the problem and the different output I get on mac and Linux: Mac: >>> from scitbx.array_family import flex >>> a = flex.size_t([7, 1, 1, 5, 1, 3, 3, 7, 1, 7, 3, 3, 5, 7, 5, 5, 5, 1, 1, 1]) >>> print list(flex.sort_permutation(a)) [1, 2, 4, 8, 17, 18, 19, 5, 6, 10, 11, 3, 12, 14, 15, 16, 0, 7, 9, 13] Linux: >>> from scitbx.array_family import flex >>> a = flex.size_t([7, 1, 1, 5, 1, 3, 3, 7, 1, 7, 3, 3, 5, 7, 5, 5, 5, 1, 1, 1]) >>> print list(flex.sort_permutation(a)) [19, 1, 2, 18, 4, 17, 8, 11, 10, 6, 5, 12, 14, 15, 16, 3, 9, 7, 13, 0] Is it known/expected for the sort order to be platform dependent, or is this a bug? Here is the relevant code for flex.sort_permutation(): https://github.com/cctbx/cctbx_project/blob/master/scitbx/array_family/sort… Cheers, Richard Dr Richard Gildea Data Analysis Scientist Tel: +441235 77 8078 Diamond Light Source Ltd. Diamond House Harwell Science & Innovation Campus Didcot Oxfordshire OX11 0DE -- This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail. Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd. Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message. Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom _______________________________________________ cctbxbb mailing list cctbxbb(a)phenix-online.org http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/cctbxbb

5 9

Unstable platform-dependent sort order for flex.sort_permutation
by richard.gildea＠diamond.ac.uk 18 Nov '16

18 Nov '16

Hi, I've been trying to diagnose why the miller array cc_anom calculations seem to be platform dependent. I've narrowed this down to a variation in the sort order returned by flex.sort_permutation which is called from within miller.array.sort("packed_indices"). The following code demonstrates the problem and the different output I get on mac and Linux: Mac: >>> from scitbx.array_family import flex >>> a = flex.size_t([7, 1, 1, 5, 1, 3, 3, 7, 1, 7, 3, 3, 5, 7, 5, 5, 5, 1, 1, 1]) >>> print list(flex.sort_permutation(a)) [1, 2, 4, 8, 17, 18, 19, 5, 6, 10, 11, 3, 12, 14, 15, 16, 0, 7, 9, 13] Linux: >>> from scitbx.array_family import flex >>> a = flex.size_t([7, 1, 1, 5, 1, 3, 3, 7, 1, 7, 3, 3, 5, 7, 5, 5, 5, 1, 1, 1]) >>> print list(flex.sort_permutation(a)) [19, 1, 2, 18, 4, 17, 8, 11, 10, 6, 5, 12, 14, 15, 16, 3, 9, 7, 13, 0] Is it known/expected for the sort order to be platform dependent, or is this a bug? Here is the relevant code for flex.sort_permutation(): https://github.com/cctbx/cctbx_project/blob/master/scitbx/array_family/sort… Cheers, Richard Dr Richard Gildea Data Analysis Scientist Tel: +441235 77 8078 Diamond Light Source Ltd. Diamond House Harwell Science & Innovation Campus Didcot Oxfordshire OX11 0DE -- This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail. Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd. Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message. Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom

2 1

convert an arbitrary point to one inside the asymmetric unit
by Tijskens Engelbert 18 Nov '16

18 Nov '16

Hi, I am an experienced C++ and Python programmer, but new to cctbx. Can any tell me if there is an algorithm in cctbx available to convert an arbritrary point in direct space to the corresponding point in the asymmetric unit of a given space group? i can figure out how to convert it to the corresponding point in the unit cell at the origin, but from there to the asymmetric unit is unclear to me. I found the brick class which gives me the assymmetric unit from cctbx import crystal,sgtbx if __name__=='__main__': crystal_symmetry = crystal.symmetry( unit_cell=(3.5093,3.5093,3.5093,90,90,90) , space_group_symbol="229" # = "I m -3 m" ) sg = crystal_symmetry.space_group() brick = sgtbx.brick( sg.type() ) print brick I also found cctbx::sgtbx::asu and the classes therein, but they are largely undocumented. For the interested, this is the problem i want to solve: I have a (scalar) physical property P(r), depending on spatial position, presented as a 3D array on a regular grid over the unit cell (space group is known). I need to integrate P(r)*f(r), f(r) being an arbitrary function over a region of direct space, which typically comprises several unit cells. In order to reduce the memory footprint of the P array, i would like to restrict it to the space group’s asymmetric unit. All help is greatly appreciated. kindest regards, Dr [Engel]bert Tijskens HPC Analyst/Consultant Flemish Supercomputer Center vscentrum.be<http://vscentrum.be> HPC core facility CalcUA uantwerp.be/calcua<http://uantwerp.be/calcua> Computational mathematics www.uantwerpen.be/en/rg/cma<http://www.uantwerpen.be/en/rg/cma> University of Antwerp Middelheimlaan1 G.309, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium engelbert.tijskens(a)uantwerpen.be<mailto:[email protected]> ++32 3 265 3879

1 0

who else has troubles to commit to cctbx now?
by Pavel Afonine 16 Nov '16

16 Nov '16

Can't commit anything since yesterday: pva_mbp:/Users/pafonine/phenix_dev/modules/cctbx_project/mmtbx % svn commit -m "test" maps/correlation.py Sending maps/correlation.py Transmitting file data .svn: E000013: Commit failed (details follow): svn: E000013: Can't create directory '/svn/p/cctbx/code/db/transactions/25717-1.txn': Permission denied pva_mbp:/Users/pafonine/phenix_dev/modules/cctbx_project/mmtbx % Nigel has the same issue. I don't see any warnings on sourceforge. Pavel

3 3

command line syntax for multiple scope PHIL
by R.D. Oeffner 09 Nov '16

09 Nov '16

Say a program, myprog, has a master PHIL definition like: minimization.input .multiple = True { file_name = None .type = str nval = None .type = int } and a PHIL input file like: minimization.input { file_name = experiment1.dat nval = 42 } minimization.input { file_name = experiment2.dat nval = 13 } so that the user on the command line can type "myprog phil_input.txt" What would be the equivalent command line syntax of the PHIL input above? Rob -- Robert Oeffner, Ph.D. Research Associate, The Read Group Department of Haematology, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research University of Cambridge Cambridge Biomedical Campus Wellcome Trust/MRC Building Hills Road Cambridge CB2 0XY www.cimr.cam.ac.uk/investigators/read/index.html tel: +44(0)1223 763234 mobile: +44(0)7712 887162

2 2

Failing shelxl test
by Graeme.Winter＠diamond.ac.uk 09 Nov '16

09 Nov '16

Folks, I keep getting this error: libtbx.python "/Users/graeme/svn/cctbx/modules/cctbx_project/cctbx/development/run_shelx.py" P31 [FAIL] Time: 1.38 Return code: 1 OKs: 0 Standard error: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/graeme/svn/cctbx/modules/cctbx_project/cctbx/development/run_shelx.py", line 253, in <module> run(args=sys.argv[1:]) File "/Users/graeme/svn/cctbx/modules/cctbx_project/cctbx/development/run_shelx.py", line 250, in run debug_utils.parse_options_loop_space_groups(args, run_call_back) File "/Users/graeme/svn/cctbx/modules/cctbx_project/cctbx/development/debug_utils.py", line 120, in parse_options_loop_space_groups show_cpu_times, **kwds) File "/Users/graeme/svn/cctbx/modules/cctbx_project/cctbx/development/debug_utils.py", line 83, in loop_space_groups call_back_result = call_back(flags, space_group_info, **kwds) File "/Users/graeme/svn/cctbx/modules/cctbx_project/cctbx/development/run_shelx.py", line 244, in run_call_back verbose=flags.Verbose) File "/Users/graeme/svn/cctbx/modules/cctbx_project/cctbx/development/run_shelx.py", line 234, in exercise run_shelx(shelx_titl, structure_factors, verbose=verbose) File "/Users/graeme/svn/cctbx/modules/cctbx_project/cctbx/development/run_shelx.py", line 210, in run_shelx check_anisou(shelx_titl, xray_structure, shelx_pdb, verbose) File "/Users/graeme/svn/cctbx/modules/cctbx_project/cctbx/development/run_shelx.py", line 163, in check_anisou assert TotalMismatches == 0 AssertionError Please verify these tests manually. it is annoying as I understand it is to do with a change in shelxl - would it be OK to comment the test out to allow builds to pass? I am not sure it is useful at the moment Thank you Graeme -- This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail. Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd. Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message. Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom

1 0

Re: [cctbxbb] Git status update
by markus.gerstel＠diamond.ac.uk 04 Nov '16

04 Nov '16

Hello everyone, since I have received no complaints and heard nothing to the contrary, so I thought I would let you know on the current state of the git migration: Until *Thursday, 1 September 2016*, 07:59 BST/08:59 CEST/11:59 pm PDT Cctbx development happens on Sourceforge. Note that cctbx development is "frozen" in preparation for the phenix release. If you are actively developing cctbx you should *now* sign up for a GitHub account. If you are not among the 27 people that have already joined the cctbx project at https://github.com/cctbx then please send me a mail with your github account name so I can invite you. In preparation for the move to github you should also install git on your machines. Set up your local installation of git on each machine you are using by running > git config --global pull.rebase true > git config --global user.name "John Doe" > git config --global user.email "your_email(a)example.com" Use an email address you have set up in your GitHub account at https://github.com/settings/emails. Note that this address will be forever publically readable! If you do not want your mail address to be public, you need to verify any (private) mail address with GitHub and then check the /Keep my email address private/ box at the link above. You can then use the dummy address <yourgithubname>@users.noreply.github.com instead. Other useful settings may be > git config --global alias.up "pull --rebase" To enable a *git up* command working much like svn up does. > git config --global alias.unstage "reset HEAD" *git unstage* to easily undo *git add*/*git rm*. > git config --global alias.mkremotebranch "push origin -u" *git mkremotebranch* will copy your current local branch to GitHub. > git config --global alias.rmremotebranch "push origin --delete" *git rmremotebranch <name>* will delete said branch from GitHub. > git config --global color.ui auto This adds color to the git output, which some may find useful for eg. *git status*. On the 1st of September the transitional period starts, and we will begin changing scripts to point to the new code locations. The transition may be delayed somewhat if the phenix release encounters any delays. I will send you further updates closer to the day. You can find and comment on the transition plan at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bTiGbnvw8lNUrBLbRmhEdnd22McDqBbiKxcpyga… Best wishes -Markus -- This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail. Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd. Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message. Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom

6 16

use_internal_variance in iotbx.merging_statistics
by Keitaro Yamashita 02 Nov '16

02 Nov '16

Dear Phenix/CCTBX developers, iotbx/merging_statistics.py is used by phenix.merging_statistics, phenix.table_one, and so on. By upgrading phenix from 1.10.1 to 1.11, merging statistics-related codes were significantly changed. Previously, miller.array.merge_equivalents() was always called with argument use_internal_variance=False, which is consistent with XDS, Aimless and so on. Currently, use_internal_variance=True is default, and cannot be changed by users (see below). These changes were made by @afonine and @rjgildea in rev. 22973 (Sep 26, 2015) and 23961 (Mar 8, 2016). Could anyone explain why these changes were introduced? https://sourceforge.net/p/cctbx/code/22973 https://sourceforge.net/p/cctbx/code/23961 My points are: - We actually cannot control use_internal_variance= parameter because it is not passed to merge_equivalents() in class filter_intensities_by_sigma. - In previous versions, if I gave XDS output to phenix.merging_statistics, <I/sigma> values calculated in the same way (as XDS does) were shown; but not in the current version. - For (for example) phenix.table_one users who expect this behavior, it can give inconsistency. The statistics would not be consistent with the data used in refinement. cf. the related discussion in cctbxbb: http://phenix-online.org/pipermail/cctbxbb/2012-October/000611.html Best regards, Keitaro

4 6

Monthly "how far are we from moving to git" message
by Graeme.Winter＠diamond.ac.uk 21 Oct '16

21 Oct '16

Good afternoon / morning / evening (depending on your locale) I'm just running a bootstrap build and having to check out the whole of cctbx one ... file ... at ... a ... time from svn & it reminded me we were going to move over to git at some point - ISTR was determined by the PHENIX release. Just wondering how this is going & how long it is likely to be until we can get this ball rolling :) Thanks & best wishes Graeme -- This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail. Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd. Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message. Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom

3 6